Hes got high apple pie, in the sky hopes….
Roy L. Pearson, is going from silly to pathetic. At this point the defendants should be able to bring suit of their own for harassment. No one cares this much about a pair of pants.
Roy L. Pearson (nyse: PSO – news – people ), a local administrative law judge, argued Wednesday that District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff failed to address his legal claims. Bartnoff had ruled that the business owners did not violate the city’s consumer protection law by failing to live up to his expectations of a “Satisfaction Guaranteed” sign once displayed in the store.
“The court effectively substituted a guarantee of satisfaction with ‘reasonable’ limits and preconditions for the unconditional and unambiguous guarantee of satisfaction the defendant-merchant chose to advertise for seven years,” Pearson wrote. “That was a fundamental legal error.”
If Bartnoff rejects Pearson’s motion, he could take the matter to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.