What is up with the feminist baby eaters? Why are they so cranky? Must be “that” time of the month.
Let me try and explain it in small easily digestible pieces. This isn’t about making friends, or appealing to those who are fucking clueless about lifes realities. This is about fighting against a belief that things were better when men were men, sheep were nervous and women had no control over the number of babies they had and were denied abortions even to save their lives.
This is about dealing with those who post comments in support of women dying and doctors being killed on ones blog. I usually just delete them. But maybe it’s time we let the sunshine under the rocks so the gatekeepers of civility can grab a fucking clue.
There was a response to my post last night. From one Rev. Spitz, Gang affiliation Army of God {goes to google, not going to direct link to people that batshit insane}
Here is a little taste from CNN re: Paul Hill;
REV. DONALD SPITZ, PAUL HILL’S SPIRITUAL ADVISER: No fear at all. I talked with him today for two hours. He has joy in his heart. He knows he obeyed the Lord God in protecting those babies from being put to death. And the government is executing him for saving the lives of those children.
ZAHN: Reverend Benham, do you think Mr. Hill was obeying his Lord God?
REV. FLIP BENHAM, OPERATION RESCUE: Well, I confronted Paul in April, two months before he killed Mr. Britton and Mr. Barrett (ph), and I beseeched him on behalf of his family and his three children, on behalf of the gospel of Jesus Christ, and on behalf of the little baby boys and girls that he was believed that he was saving, to cease and desist from spreading this heresy, because one is not to overcome murder by murdering people. And Paul became the very thing that he hated. And it breaks my heart that he is going to lose his life tonight, but it is required of him. Capital punishment was set up in the Bible to protect human life. As a matter of fact, that was the beginning of all civil government. And so Paul is reaping the consequences. And my prayer for Paul, if you’re just look into my eyes, Paul, as I pray that you repent before you meet your maker, and that you receive the forgiveness that only Jesus can give.
ZAHN: Reverend Spitz, though, you say it’s not necessary for him to repent?
SPITZ: No, Paul Hill has nothing to repent of. He did what he had to do. He saved those babies. What was the option? The option was to let that baby killing abortionist go into the abortion mill and murder 32 babies.
Now, if Paul Hill did not do that, those 32 babies would be dead. Of course, he did the right thing. I don’t know how anybody in their right mind can think he did the wrong thing when those babies are alive, and whereas if he didn’t do what he did, those 32 babies would be dead.
Here is his lovely comment “Shelley Shannon is a wonderful person.”
Here is background info on Shannon
When you cast us in the same light as people who actively, or passively through tactic support, engage in the murders of doctors and others, who set god up as a mafia don, who gleefully show distorted and falsified pictures to small children, you show that you have no more concern for women than they do.
In the realm of human rights there is NO MIDDLE GROUND!
“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.” Desmond Tutu
matttbastard says
Ah, Rev. Spitz. I’m surprised he hasn’t made an appearance before now.
I hear that violent terrorists are pretty reasonable folks once you get past the violent, murderous rhetoric (backed up by, er, actual violence and murder). Did you invite him over for tea and crumpets, maybe a little healthy parlour debate?
Prole says
Got any chocolate around here? I’m on the rag, or in a snit or something. 👿
opit says
For shame : to be upset that programmed killers act out their fantasies : not knowing right from wrong and bamboozled into compliance with their contradictory ‘moral imperatives’.
This isn’t a question of few nutty people : but of a program of ‘attitude adjustment’ via ‘religious revelation’ working its infernal ends.
Too extreme ? Explain the Middle East turmoil imposed by the oil barons in terms other than moral bankruptcy. This is part and parcel of the imperatives of empire.
Have I ignored the topic of conversation? Nope.Just part of a larger ‘plan’.Conspiracy ? Hell, yes.
😈 Aren’t you glad Canadians are ‘making nice’ with the U.S.A. ?