How the hell does a surgeon ‘accidently’ sever a penis? The man in question was having surgery on his testicles, the court said the surgeon was “superficial” in his approach to the operation. Superficial? Superficial would be uneven, stitches, crappy follow-up care. Severing his penis is way beyond superficial.
Apparently this 33 year old now has no penis at all. Which leads me to wonder why?? Presumable the cut was made with a sharp scalpel, shouldn’t re-attachment have been an “easy” process? Hell if John Bobbit has his hacked away by his wife, driven around, bounced off a windshield, vacationing on the side of the road and re-attached to a fully functioning porn movie star mode, what happened in this case?
The victim was awarded $795,000. I’m guessing he would rather be poor and intact.
CBC Story here