• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

April Reign

Speak your mind even if your voice shakes

Debra

Reporting with Non-Sexist Language

10/25/2008 by Debra

A group of journalists in Argentina have hashed out a ten point guideline of non-sexist reporting. Covering things like stopping referring to partner murder as “crimes of passion” to perpetuating the Madonna myth when reporting on female violent crime.

Among other evidence for sexism in news coverage, PAR mentions “detailed descriptions of what a woman was wearing or, in the case of murders committed by women, emphatic indignation because they go against ‘maternal instinct,’ which is a way of sacralising motherhood.”

“There is an exaggeration of the association between motherhood and womanhood, and an underlying need for women to be good,” the journalist said.

The document will officially launch Nov. 25th, which is also International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women.

The new rules;

1. The following terms are correct usage: violence against women, gender-based violence and sexist violence.

2. Gender-based violence is a crime insofar as it is illegal behaviour that must be prevented and punished, a social problem, an assault on the right to life, dignity, and physical and psychological integrity of women, and an issue that concerns the defence of human rights.

3. We will uproot from our work the term “crime of passion” to refer to murders of women who are victims of gender violence. Crimes of passion do not exist.

4. It is of the utmost importance to protect the identity of the victim, rather than that of the aggressor. Make it clear who is the aggressor and who is the victim, and indicate what attitudes and situations may put women in violent relationships at risk, to help raise their awareness about their situation.

5. Some information can harm the victims and their families. It is not always a good idea to identify the victim. It is offensive to refer to victims by diminutives, short forms of proper names, nicknames, and so on.

6. We will never look for justifications or “motives” (alcohol, drugs, arguments, jealousy, a couple’s separation, infidelity, and so on) that only distract attention from the central issue: violence. The cause of gender-based violence is the control and domination that certain men exercise over women.

7. It is essential to check the facts, especially from official sources.

8. Keep the subject on the agenda by denouncing violence in all its forms: psychological, economic, and emotional, without waiting for women to be killed. Tell the story taking into account the uniqueness of each event, but also the elements that each has in common with other cases. This will help us avoid the use of expressions like “once again” or “yet another case of,” and prevent a dulling of sensitivities.

9. Be particularly careful with the photographs and images illustrating the article. Respect the victims and their families, and avoid sexism, sensationalism and obscenity. Never steal images or audio material from a victim. When using a musical background, do not select motifs that inspire terror, or lyrics that talk about “love-sickness” or jealousy.

10. Our articles will always include a free telephone helpline number for victims, and any other information that may be useful for them.

Filed Under: media

Gaming: Addiction or Crisis du jour?

10/23/2008 by Debra

With the sad case of a Barrie youth in the news recently, many news organizations are taking the opportunity to ramp up fear and misunderstanding of gamers, games and gaming in general.

The term addiction is being thrown around like the word maverick at a GOP rally. The truth of the role gaming plays in the average youths life is getting lost among the rhetoric.
For adults with fond memories of tree climbing, tag, pick-up games of baseball, hours of bike riding the thought of staying in glued to a tv or computer may seem addictive. However, seen in the context of a time when children, even teens, are kept under surveillance for their safety, when fewer and fewer children have access to sports or other activities, when our children’s lives are ruled by the fear of danger, the world gaming offers them a safe refuge. Here they have power, they have freedom and they can interact with others with similar interests. They are making friends across the world in much the same way in a less technological time people had pen pals. Our children are partaking of the global village from the safety of their own homes.

Many parents, though they may use the internet for work purposes, do not understand online culture. They, through the media, have learned to see the internet as a scary place, a place where predators lurk and bad things happen. Instead of taking an interest in and including themselves in their children’s activities parents are making ultimatums and failing to recognize the friendships their children have forged, the skills they are developing or the knowledge they have gained. Through many of these games children pick up knowledge about history, geography, math, reading. They learn co-operation, goal setting, consequences of actions. Certainly some will be adversely affected by first person shooter style games, however, games are simply the scapegoat of their actions not the underlying cause. Long before there were games on which to blame all the ills of youth there were some youth who had problems. Just being an adolescent ensures that there will be problems especially with the parents from whom they are trying to detach. Games are played from home as a rule and so this is a generation whose parents are voyeurs to their adolescent indulgences.
Of course the media dramatists such as Dr. Phil are in there quoting myths and creating unease. Lets look at some of the myths and realities.

MYTH: Within hours of the 2007 shootings at Virginia Tech, pundits were on the airwaves and the Internet blaming video games for Seung-Hui Cho’s violent behavior. For example, media darling and pop psychologist Phil McGraw, appearing on CNN’s Larry King Live, stated, “Common sense tells you that if these kids are playing video games, where they’re on a mass killing spree in a video game, it’s glamorized on the big screen, it’s become part of the fiber of our society…. The mass murders [sic] of tomorrow are the children of today that are being programmed with this massive violence overdose.” Former Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate Mitt Romney, in an address to new graduates of Regent University, said, “Pornography and violence poison our music and movies and TV and video games. The Virginia Tech shooter, like the Columbine shooters before him, had drunk from this cesspool.”

FACT: The official report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel specifically dismissed the purported links between Cho’s use of video games and his extremely violent behavior. In the chapter on Cho’s mental health history, video games are mentioned on only three pages. When he was nine years old, “he was enrolled in a Tae Kwon Do program for awhile, watched TV, and played video games like Sonic the Hedgehog. None of the video games were war games or had violent themes.” (p. 32) In college, “Cho’s roommate never saw him play video games.” (p. 42) During his senior year of college, his roommate “never saw him play a video game, which he thought strange since he and most other students play them.” (p. 51)

MYTH: In August 2005, the American Psychological Association issued a resolution on violence in video games and interactive media, stating that “perpetrators go unpunished in 73 percent of all violent scenes, and therefore teach that violence is an effective way of resolving conflict.”

FACT: The allegation that “perpetrators go unpunished in 73 percent of all violent scenes” is based on research from the mid-1990s that looked at selected television programs, not video games.

SOURCE

The reality is that games do not create more aggression, are not more likely to produce school shooters and in fact most games are very clear in their delineations of right and wrong as we as a society have defined them.

It is possible to play from the ‘wrong’ side in many games, however, there are generally penalties for doing so and I would rather my child experiment with the wrong side in a virtual world than the real one.

Gamers do spend a lot of time involved in their efforts, they are proud of their accomplishments, their stats and their levels. Ask them about it in all likelihood they will be more than happy to share with you. Of course if you roll your eyes or act as though shooting 3D graphics is the same as wielding a gun on the sidewalk be prepared to be shut out.

I’ve always taken an interest in my kids gaming activities. My younger kids often point out particularly cool parts of the games, and my adult son will often phone me to let me know of his latest accomplishment. I don’t watch my children practising for hours to make a goal, or perfect their slapshot or get their kick down. I have watched them practise for hours to reach a level –even helped on occasion! I don’t consider their time wasted or their interest an addiction any more than I would were they spending the time crafting sporting skills. I’m not a hockey mom or a soccer mom. I’m a gamer mom and darn proud of it!

Filed Under: media

Next time Stevie go to Ikea!

10/21/2008 by Debra

22 Minutes hits one out of the park. Go here and click on Avery Adams Election Wrap Up. You’ll be glad you did!

Oh and Stevie here’s the link to the Ikea catalogue.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: 22 minutes, Canada, comedy, election, Harper

Anti-Choice – Anti-Truth

10/21/2008 by Debra

Members of the anti-abortion group VoteYesForLife.com are filing a complaint with the FCC over ads they claim are false and misleading. False and misleading. Where have we heard that before? Oh yes Crisis Pregnancy Centres;

* The centers provided false and misleading information about a link between abortion and breast cancer. There is a medical consensus that induced abortion does not cause an increased risk of breast cancer. Despite this consensus, eight centers told the caller that having an abortion would in fact increase her risk. One center said that “all abortion causes an increased risk of breast cancer in later years,” while another told the caller that an abortion would “affect the milk developing in her breasts” and that the risk of breast cancer increased by as much as 80% following an abortion.
* The centers provided false and misleading information about the effect of abortion on future fertility. Abortions in the first trimester, using the most common abortion procedure, do not pose an increased risk of infertility. However, seven centers told the caller that having an abortion could hurt her chances of having children in the future. One center said that damage from abortion could lead to “many miscarriages” or to “permanent damage” so “you wouldn’t be able to carry,” telling the caller that this is “common” and happens “a lot.”
* The centers provided false and misleading information about the mental health effects of abortion. Research shows that significant psychological stress after an abortion is no more common than after birth. However, thirteen centers told the caller that the psychological effects of abortion are severe, long-lasting, and common. One center said that the suicide rate in the year after an abortion “goes up by seven times.” Another center said that post-abortion stress suffered by women having abortions is “much like” that seen in soldiers returning from Vietnam and “is something that anyone who’s had an abortion is sure to suffer from.”

PDF false-and-misleading-health-information

So we know they are coming from a place of truth then.

Here is what Proposition 11 entails

For the second time since 2006, South Dakota voters are being asked to outlaw almost all abortions. A ballot initiative called Initiated Measure 11 would ban the procedure except in cases of rape, incest and a narrow interpretation of the health and life of the woman.

Voters rejected a more restrictive measure in 2006, but polls suggested that South Dakotans would have voted yes if it had included exceptions. A group called Vote Yes for Life soon pushed the new version, which they hope will prevent more than 700 abortions a year and produce the case that will overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling legalizing abortion nationwide.

The ads to which the anti-choice group objects states that;

“These claims are being made, almost unbelievably, that the government will decide when a woman needs an abortion, and not her physician,” said Aberdeen lawyer Rory King, who helped to draft the initiated measure. “We object strenuously to and oppose this deceitful advertising.”

AL

and here is a doctor who specializes in high risk pregnancy care;

Marvin Buehner, a pro-choice Rapid City doctor who specializes in high-risk pregnancies, said the law “would amount to a total ban.”

“If there’s a risk of a Class 4 felony if I don’t meet the ambiguous standard of ‘serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily organ or system,’ there’s no way I would consider doing an abortion for health reasons,” Buehner said. “This represents incredible government interference in the practice of medicine.”

WP

One can’t help but feel that their real objection is to people knowing the truth.

More on Prop. 11 here: http://www.sdhealthyfamilies.org/

Filed Under: abortion Tagged With: abortion, anti choice, FCC, proposition 11, South Dakota, truth

Dion Steps Down

10/20/2008 by Debra


As was expected Dion stepped down as Liberal leader today.
Dion endured smears from the beginning. About his ability to converse in English, his light frame, his backpack and even his ability to answer incredibly poorly worded questions. Conservative ads consistently showed Dion as weak and ineffectual, it was the modern day equivalent of the big dumb bully kicking sand in the face of the nerd.

Though not a Liberal supporter I do think Dion is a man of honour and integrity. And while I don’t necessarily support his policies I do believe he has a great respect for both the country and the environment. In that he showed himself head and shoulders above Harper.

What may be the unkindest cut of all is that so much of the campaign to oust him came from within his own party. He was lured into the shadowy corners of the Big Tent and shived in the back.

John Manley, seen as a possible successor was quoted as saying, “If I were to be critical of Stephane, I think he took the party in a direction where it was fighting in a very crowded field for too few votes on the left side of the spectrum and that’s not where you win elections” The Star

This would seem indicative that the Libs have decided to follow the Conservatives on the track to the right wing fringes. With the majority of Canadians who did vote voting in support of ‘progressive’ parties, and so many choosing to abstain from voting, one wonders what makes them believe this move to conservatism is something the Canadian public wants. After all previous liberal governments have shown that campaigning from the left has served them well.

A move to a right wing agenda would of course be a move away from Dion’s plans for environmental protections and the Greens already represent right wing market based environmentalists. It will be interesting to see where on the political spectrum the Liberal power brokers place the party.

Shortly before the election, in response to Harper’s taunts to the other leaders about quitting if they were not elected as PM, Dion said, “I am not a quitter”. I don’t believe he is. It is too bad though that his party quit him.

I wish Mr Dion well in his future endeavours.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Dion, Liberals, Politics

2008 Blog Action Day: Poverty

10/15/2008 by Debra

With last night’s election results revealing another NeoCon minority government, it seems fitting somehow that today is Blog Action Day ’08 A call to action for bloggers to raise awareness on issues of poverty.

During the campaign Make Poverty History asked the leaders what they would do about poverty both home and abroad, not surprisingly “All of them except Conservative leader Stephen Harper agreed to answer our questions about their plans to fight poverty.” There is a take action section here to ask Harper what he plans to do about poverty. I think we can well guess his answer though.

From the Campaign 2000 sidebar “On November 24, 1989, the House of Commons unanimously passed a resolution to seek to achieve the goal of eliminating poverty among Canadian children by the year 2000.”

Well here we are in the year 2008 and child poverty if anything has increased. Incomes have been steadily eroded by regressive right wing policies. The constant cutting of social safety nets to provide funds to corporations that then take the money and run to other countries where workers are cheaper, have fewer or no rights and are often forced into labour, has resulted in more and more families making the choice between paying the rent and buying groceries. Between paying utilities or getting the kids new shoes/coats/birthday presents. There is no money for lessons or activities, no money for special treats, no trips. Children in poverty grow up in a war zone. The class war. The war no one speaks of unless the poor get a little rowdy and call into question the policies that have created a system where the boots of the few rest on the backs of the many, including so many children. So called “think tanks” like the Frasier Institute create formulae to determine that you only live in poverty if you are further than 500 miles from a shelter and there is no dumpster from which you can eat.

Deceit and manipulation has convinced that masses that social programs are too costly and any move toward *gasp* socialism would bankrupt the country/world economy. Yet if you look around after decades of rampant unfettered capitalism and corporate welfare the world economies are in collapse and governments are resorting to enormous amounts of socialist cash infusion into the banking industry to try to provide a solution to a world wide depression. No where near the amount of money spent on this fiasco could have provided decent housing, health care, eliminated, or vastly decreased, child poverty And proper regulations surrounding the treatment of workers and the expectations of corporations to keep jobs in Canada would have resulted in good jobs and plenty of cash influx into the economy. Yet instead we are told to tighten our belts while CEO’s reap obscene amounts of money even in a crashing economy.

If we as a country truly believe that it is acceptable that a child goes hungry while corporations that have no concern for or loyalty to our country or our citizens receive 50 billion dollars in tax cuts. If we as a country truly believe it is ok for people to live on the street while banks receive infusions of cash to prop up the obvious and glaring failures of a capitalist corportocracy. If we as a country truly believe it is more important to provide CEOs with multiple homes while others have no home or are in danger of losing theirs with just one missed day of work, then we have well and truly lost our humanity.

Filed Under: poverty

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 93
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Community

  • MoS on Snowy Afternoon Walking With My Dog
  • anonymous on Snowy Afternoon Walking With My Dog
  • Alison on Psstt… Hey you! Ya You Poking Your Nose In Other People’s Wombs.. Come Here
  • Debra on Facebook and Progressive Values
  • anymouse on Facebook and Progressive Values

WordPress Design,
Consultation & Training

Fat Cat Designs

Copyright © 2026 | Privacy Policy | Log in | Home

 

Loading Comments...
 

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkNoRead more
    Revoke Consent